Alezia Dellner Alexia Dellner These 8 Fashion Lines Are as Stylish as They Are Sustainable

Can fashion ever be sustainable?

(Image credit:

Alamy/Javier Hirschfeld

)

Fashion accounts for effectually 10% of greenhouse gas emissions from human activeness, but there are ways to reduce the impact your wardrobe has on the climate.

"For years I was obsessed with buying clothes," says Snezhina Piskova. "I would purchase x pairs of very inexpensive jeans just for the sake of having more diversity in my wardrobe for a depression price, even though I ended up wearing only two or iii of them."

When information technology comes to resisting the lure of mode, Piskova faces a tougher challenge than most. As a copywriter for a visitor in the fashion industry she'southward surrounded past fashionistas. And it'due south been piece of cake to go along with the tide.

Only conversations about the climate crisis made Piskova, who lives in Sofia, Bulgaria, consider the impact that the manufacture and her ain shopping habits were having.

The mode industry accounts for about 8-10% of global carbon emissions, and near 20% of wastewater. And while the environmental impact of flying is now well known, fashion sucks up more energy than both aviation and shipping combined.

Yous might also like:

● Should you go along a "flight diet"?
● Why your bin is a climate problem
● The surprising price of beingness online

Habiliment in full general has circuitous supply chains that makes it hard to account for all of the emissions that come from producing a pair of trousers or new coat. Then there is how the clothing is transported and disposed of when the consumer no longer wants it anymore.

The style industry is responsible for more carbon emissions than those that come from aviation (Credit: Getty Images/Alamy/Javier Hirschfeld)

While most consumer goods endure from similar issues, what makes the way industry peculiarly problematic is the frenetic pace of change information technology not just undergoes, but encourages. With each passing season (or microseason), consumers are pushed into ownership the latest items to stay on trend.

It'south hard to visualise all of the inputs that become into producing garments, simply permit's take denim as an example. The Un estimates that a single pair of jeans requires a kilogram of cotton fiber. And considering cotton fiber tends to be grown in dry environments, producing this kilo requires almost 7,500–x,000 litres of h2o. That's well-nigh 10 years' worth of drinking water for one person.

At that place are ways to brand denim less resource-intensive, but in general, jeans composed of material that is as close to the natural country of cotton as possible utilize less water and hazardous treatments to produce. This ways less bleaching, less sandblasting, and less pre-washing.

Unfortunately it also means that some of the most popular types of jeans are the hardest on the planet. For case, material dyes pollute water bodies, with devastating effects on aquatic life and drinking water. And the stretchy elastane fabric woven through many trendy styles of tight jeans is made using synthetic materials derived from plastic, which reduces recyclability and increases the environmental affect further.

Jeans manufacturer Levi Strauss estimates that a pair of its iconic 501 jeans will produce the equivalent of 33.4kg of carbon dioxide equivalent beyond its entire lifespan – about the same as driving 69 miles in the average US machine. Simply over a third of those emissions come from the fibre and fabric production, while another 8% is from cutting, sewing and finishing the jeans. Packaging, transport and retail accounts for xvi% of the emissions while the remaining xl% is from consumer use – mainly from washing the jeans – and disposal in landfill.

Another study of jeans fabricated in India that contained ii% elastane showed that producing the fibres and denim fabric released 7kg more carbon than those in Levi's analysis. Information technology suggests that choosing raw denim products will have less impact on the climate.

Simply it is too possible to expect for further ways of reducing the impact of your jeans by looking at the label. Certification programmes like the Better Cotton fiber Initiative and Global Organic Textile Standard can help consumers piece of work out how greenish their denim is (although these programmes aren't perfect – many suffer from a lack of funding and the complex supply chains for cotton fiber tin make it hard to account where information technology all comes from).

Growing the cotton needed for a single pair of jeans requires a huge amount of water, while dying and manufacturing processes use nevertheless more than (Credit: Getty Images/Javier Hirschfeld)

Some manufacturers are besides working on ways to reduce the environmental impact from the production of their jeans, while others accept been developing ways of recycling denim or even jeans that will decompose inside a few months when composted.

It's not cotton fiber, but the synthetic polymer polyester that is the nigh mutual fabric used in wear. Globally, "65% of the vesture that we wear is polymer-based", says Lynn Wilson, an practiced on the circular economy, who for her PhD inquiry at the University of Glasgow is focusing on consumer behaviour related to clothing disposal.

Effectually 70 1000000 barrels of oil a year are used to brand polyester fibres in our clothes. From waterproof jackets to frail scarves, it's extremely difficult to go abroad from the stuff. Office of this stems from the convenience – polyester is easy to clean and durable. It is also lightweight and inexpensive.

But a shirt made from polyester has double the carbon footprint compared to one fabricated from cotton wool. A polyester shirt produces the equivalent of 5.5kg of carbon dioxide compared to 2.1kg from a cotton shirt.

Swapping clothes with friends can refresh your wardrobe and bring an interesting new dimension to your friendship (Credit: Getty Images/Javier Hirschfeld)

A simple way to reduce the footprint from online shopping so is to only order what we really want and intend to continue. According to the Globe Bank, forty% of clothing purchased in some countries is never used.

Piskova has tried to motion away from the fast manner civilization herself by learning to capeesh what she already has rather than what she could accept. Simply detaching herself from a way-obsessed mindset hasn't been easy. To assist, Piskova resists going to places where she feels pressure level to swallow, such equally shopping malls. She also periodically swaps dress with her friends, which not only allows them to refresh their own wardrobes but likewise helps them feel closer to each other. And she has also learned to embrace pocket-size blemishes on her clothes, rather than seeing these as an excuse to purchase more.

"People are so careful with their clothes, like to not have any scratches on them or have any holes or whatsoever," says Piskova. "But then when you think nigh information technology, that's part of the wearing apparel. You recall that 1 time when y'all went to a festival, where you ripped your shirt or something like that, and it'south a nice memory."

The number of times you wear an detail of clothing tin can brand a large deviation too in its overall carbon footprint. Research by scientists at the Chalmers Institute of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, establish that an boilerplate cotton fiber t-shirt might release simply over 2kg of carbon dioxide equivalent into the temper while a polyester dress would release the equivalent of virtually 17kg of carbon dioxide.

Sometimes the best way to reduce the touch your style choices have on the environs is break free of the herd (Credit: Getty Images/Javier Hirschfeld)

They estimated, however, that the boilerplate t-shirt in Sweden is worn around 22 times in a twelvemonth, while the average dress is worn just 10 times. This would mean the amount of carbon released per wear is many times higher for the wearing apparel.

According to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the average number of times a piece of clothing is worn decreased by 36% between 2000 and 2015. In the aforementioned period, clothing production doubled. These gains came at the expense of the quality and longevity of the garments.

A number of public surveys too suggest that many of us accept clothes in our wardrobes that we hardly ever clothing. Co-ordinate to one survey, about half of the dress in the average Great britain person's wardrobe are never worn, primarily because they no longer fit or have gone out of style. Another found that a fifth of the items owned by Usa consumers are unworn.

It is clear that investing in higher-quality clothing, wearing them more often and belongings onto them for longer, is the not-so-underground weapon for combatting the carbon footprint from your garments. In the Great britain, continuing to actively wear a garment for merely 9 months longer could diminish its environmental impacts past 20–30%.

Naturally, some clothing companies take sniffed out an opportunity here. Clothing rental services, for instance, are especially highly-seasoned in a social-media era where some people are reluctant to be seen online wearing the same outfit more than once. For those who desire to await expert in their online photos simply have even less of an bear upon on the environment, there is the ephemeral trend for digital fashion, or clothing designed to only announced online past being superimposed onto your images.

Buying less as well means caring for clothes more. Websites like Love Your Apparel, set up by UK recycling charity WRAP, offering tips on repairing and extending the life of clothes, which can reduce the carbon footprint of the dress.

But tackling the underlying reasons for why we over-purchase, nevertheless underuse, clothes could too help. In a consumerist society, people are trained to find fast fashion pleasurable and addictive.

"A lot of the things that we purchase fulfil some kind of role in ourselves – particularly manner items," says Mike Kyrios, a clinical psychologist who researches mental disorders at Australia's Flinders University. People who have lower cocky-esteem or worry about their status are especially likely to use overspending every bit a route to experience like they "belong", he explains. As are people who are sensitive to rewards – indeed the reward centres in the brain are those most activated by impulse shopping.

Online shopping also means that the impulse to purchase is harder to control, as internet stores are open 24/7 – including, as Kyrios says, the times "when your conclusion-making capabilities are at their minimum".

Though estimates vary, one is that about 5% of the population exhibits compulsive buying behaviour. "The problem is it's well hidden," says Kyrios. "People don't evidence up for handling, people don't acknowledge it's a trouble."

Ane solution might be to but ration the fourth dimension y'all spend looking at clothes online, but perhaps a amend arroyo is to find less wasteful ways of achieving the sense of advantage that over-spenders are seeking. Mainstream consumers can scratch their itch for new clothes by ownership from vintage and secondhand article of clothing shops.

Wearing our garments for even simply a few months longer can reduce the bear on they have on the planet (Credit: Alamy/Javier Hirschfeld)

"Secondhand vesture is giving apparel a second life and it's slowing down that fast-way cycle," says Fee Gilfeather, a sustainable fashion adept at charity Oxfam. "So I would say secondhand (clothing) is actually one of the solutions to the overconsumption challenge."

Cut down on washing tin also assistance to further reduce the carbon footprint of your wardrobe, while also helping to lower water apply and the number of microfibres shed in the washing machine.

"You don't demand to launder clothes equally often every bit you lot might call back," says Gilfeather. She hangs some of her dresses out to air, for example, rather than washing them later on each wear. "Reducing the amount of washing that you need to do is the best mode of making sure that the plastics don't become into the water system."

How you dispose of the wearing apparel at the end of their useful life is as well important. Throwing them abroad so they end upwardly in landfill or being incinerated merely leads to more emissions. Perhaps the all-time approach is to pass them on to friends or accept them to charity shops if they are still good enough to exist worn. However, individuals should be careful not to employ this equally a style of clearing infinite simply to purchase new wearing apparel, which Wilson'due south research suggests is common.

Where vesture has been worn or damaged beyond repair, the most environmentally sound way of disposing them is to ship them for recycling. Clothing recycling is still relatively new for many fabrics simply increasingly cotton and polyester clothing can at present be turned into new clothes or other items. Some major manufacturers have now started using recycled fabrics, just it is often hard for consumers to notice places to take their onetime clothes.

Many of the changes needed to make clothing more sustainable have to be implemented by the manufacturers and big companies that control the fashion industry. Only every bit consumers the changes we all brand in our behaviour not only add up, but can drive alter in the industry, besides.

According to Gilfeather, we can all make a difference past being more thoughtful as consumers.

--

Smart Guide to Climate change

For nigh BBC Hereafter readers, the question of whether climatic change is happening is no longer something that needs to be asked. Instead, there is now growing business concern about what each of us as individuals tin do about it. This new series, our Smart Guide to Climate Change, uses scientific research and data to break downwards the well-nigh effective strategies each of u.s. can take to compress our carbon footprint.

--

Join one one thousand thousand Future fans by liking us on Facebook , or follow u.s. on Twitter  or Instagram .

If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "The Essential Listing". A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

Share this post